November 20, 2022 from 4CMiTVworld

GOOGLE A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
FACEBOOK A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
YOUTUBE A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment
TWITTER A Serious Violators of the 1st Amendment

Remarks: UK scientists created mutant Covid strains in ‘high-risk, low-benefit’ lab experiments: SAGE-linked team comes under fire amid calls for more regulation over controversial ‘gain-of-function’ research. Twenty scientists were involved in the project, including one who sits on Government advisory panel SAGE; Our revelation comes amid ongoing furore over similar Covid experiments in the US, at Boston University. Critics of the lab experiments, carried out by Imperial College London earlier this year, called it ‘insanity’. FULL STORY HERE:

Keep Informed

BACKGROUND HEADLINESUK scientists created mutant Covid strains in ‘high-risk, low-benefit’ lab experiments: SAGE-linked team comes under fire amid calls for more regulation over controversial ‘gain-of-function’ research.

Boston University and Gain of Function: my first reaction was denial as i first saw this story float the internet. “Boston University doing gain of function work on Covid Virus’s, I thought seriously this must be satire as who the hell got up one morning and was that bored, they said “Fuck it” I think I turn that SARS-CoV2 strain into a major lethal killer bug.

Seriously there can’t be anybody who has the knowledge and access to the equipment in USA and that Batshit Crazy to be screwing with SARS-CoV-2 and manipulate the gain of function to have a kill rate of 80 percent.

Stupid Me: Today we read this Lunacy is not restricted to the USA its clearly spread to the United Kingdom; there appears to be no shortage of BatShit Crazy within the field of R&D Science in USA and United Kingdom! Silly Me My mistake: to think there was only “One mad scientist” Antony Fauci who currently has more spotlights on him than German Bombers experienced doing raids over England.

Today Mail Online can revealed “British scientists intentionally created hybrid Covid strains in risky experiments judged to be like ‘playing with fire’.

■ Hamsters were infected with mutant viruses, blends of original Wuhan strain and parts of Omicron or Delta

■ Critics of the lab experiments, carried out by Imperial College London earlier this year, called it ‘insanity’

■ Twenty scientists were involved in the project, including one who sits on Government advisory panel SAGE

■ But the university insists study, part-funded by the taxpayer, followed UK regulations and was entirely safe

■ Our revelation comes amid ongoing furore over similar Covid experiments in the US, at Boston University

Hamsters were infected with mutant viruses, blends of the original Wuhan strain and parts of either Omicron [1]SEE URL: or Delta.

Critics of the research, carried out by Imperial College London, [2]SEE URL: called it ‘insanity’ and warned the lab trials could, in theory, unleash a new viral threat. Twenty scientists were involved in the project, including one who sits on the Government’s advisory panel SAGE. [3]SEE URL:

But the university insists the study, part-funded by the taxpayer, followed British regulations and was entirely safe.

Our revelation comes amid ongoing furore over similar experiments in the US, where authorities have proposed a crackdown on virus manipulation research.

Earlier this month,, Mail Online’s US equivalent, revealed academics at Boston University combined different parts of the Omicron and the original Wuhan Covid strains.


Picture Above: Hamsters were infected with mutant viruses, blends of the original Wuhan strain and parts of either Omicron or Delta. Critics of the research, carried out by Imperial College London, called it ‘insanity’ and warned the lab trials could, in theory, unleash a new viral threat. Twenty scientists were involved in the project, including one who sits on the Government’s advisory panel SAGE


Picture Above: In a trial eerily akin to that of the Boston project, Imperial researchers (pictured, a lab at the university – not necessarily the one where the experiments were carried out) infected hamsters with two chimera Covid hybrids, the results of which were published online on May 13. It was carried out in a biosafety level-3 lab, which requires doors to be sealed and workers to wear hazmat suits


Picture Above: Imperial’s study was partly funded by the Government, through an offshoot of an agency called UK Research and Innovation

Critics say this combined the higher lethality of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 version, which triggered the pandemic in early 2020, with the extreme transmissibility of the milder Omicron strain. Omicron is said to be just contagious as measles, although the claim is disputed.

The hybrid virus they created killed 80 per cent of infected mice.

Boston University defended its research, saying it proved less lethal than the Wuhan type on its own.

It vehemently denied the experiments could be considered ‘gain of function’, a controversial field of science that sees virologists intentionally manipulate pathogens to make them more infectious or deadly to prepare for future pandemics — allowing them to develop vaccines and therapies in case diseases naturally evolve to become more dangerous.

A leak of such an engineered virus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology is one of the main theorised origins of the pandemic. The infamous lab carried out similar research involving coronaviruses found in bats, with some arguing this work constituted gain of function experiments, though others refute this.

But others argued the Boston University research was unquestionably gain of function as it had the potential of increasing its transmissibility — even if the end, result appeared to be the opposite.

Professor Shmuel Shapira, former director of the Israeli Government’s Institute for Biological Research, stated any similar research should be banned because it is effectively ‘playing with fire’.

This is due to the potential, albeit tiny, risk that such a virus could escape strict biosecurity measures in a lab and go on to infect people.


Picture Above: are scientists working at Boston’s high-tech infectious diseases lab in the South End neighbourhood of the city. Experiments on Covid here were funded by Boston University, but grants from NIAID were credited as a ‘courtesy’ because the research used tools developed using them.

A picture containing text, indoor, person Description automatically generated

Picture Above: Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories is one of 13 biosafety level 4 labs in the US


Picture Above: 80 percent of mice died from the new man-made Covid strain, while none died from the milder Omicron variant alone, researchers at Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories found

Mail Online’s investigations have uncovered a similar experiment that has flown under the radar here in the UK.

In a trial eerily akin to that of the Boston project, Imperial researchers infected hamsters with two chimera Covid hybrids, the results of which were published online[4]SEE URL: on May 13. It was carried out in a biosafety level-3 lab, which requires doors to be sealed and workers to wear hazmat suits.

One virus, like in the Boston experiment, was the original Wuhan strain given an Omicron spike protein — the tiny structure on the surface of the virus that it uses to infect human cells.

The second was a Wuhan strain given the spike protein of the Delta variant, which analyses suggested was even deadlier than the original type of Covid.

Each major variant of SARS-CoV-2 — the virus behind Covid — carries mutations in its spike protein, which is why some prove more immune-evasive than others.

This is, in part, due to the original batch of vaccines being designed to specifically target the Wuhan strain’s spike protein, as opposed to strains that emerged later in the pandemic.

After infecting the hamsters, scientists then monitored them for weight loss — a sign they were becoming weaker.

This allowed them to see if certain attributes of each strain, such as Delta’s severity or Omicron’s infectiousness, were linked to their spike proteins or to other elements of their genetic make-up.

Results were compared to rodents infected with unmodified strains.

Nasal swabs were also regularly taken to measure the viral loads — a measure of how much the virus was in their body — of the hamsters.

Over the next 10 days, hamsters hosting the hybrid viruses either lost more or didn’t put on as much weight and had higher viral loads than those infected with their regular versions.

It is not detailed whether the hamsters survived or were euthanised after the project finished. Imperial refused to provide this information.

Professor Wendy Barclay, a member of SAGE, the panel that guided No10 through the Covid pandemic, was the lead author of the project.

Presenting the results of the hamster experiment, her team said the results suggested that Omicron’s mild nature was linked to genetic mutations other than those located on its spike protein.

Imperial’s study was partly funded by the Government, through an offshoot of an agency called UK Research and Innovation.

The Imperial study was not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Instead, it was made available as a preprint.

Dr Richard Ebright, a chemist at Rutgers University in New Jersey and a vocal campaigner against gain of function research, described the study uncovered by Mail Online as sheer ‘insanity’.

‘The Imperial preprint reports an additional example of the construction of non-natural, lab-generated chimera that combines the spike gene of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 with the rest of the genetic information of an original 2018-2020 SARS-CoV2,’ he said.

word-image-44319-7.pngA person wearing glasses Description automatically generated with medium confidence
Professor Wendy BarclayDr Thomas Peacock

Picture Above: Professor Wendy Barclay (left), a member of SAGE, the panel that guided No10 through the Covid pandemic, was the lead author of the project. Dr Thomas Peacock (right) was also involved

He said the resulting virus, like the Boston experiment, combined the high immune-escape abilities of Omicron with the higher severity of other Covid variants.

Dr Ebright, an expert in molecular biology who focuses on developing drugs to treat infectious diseases, added that, as the research has no ‘foreseeable practical applications’, it was extremely high risk for little reward.

‘This is insanity, both in terms of the redundancy and waste,’ he told this website. ‘And, especially, in terms of the risk of triggering a new pandemic wave upon accidental or deliberate release of the laboratory-generated viruses.


‘If the world wishes to avoid new pandemic waves and pandemics caused by lab-generated enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, then it is urgently necessary to restrict senseless high-risk, low-benefit research that creates enhanced potential pandemic pathogens and to implement effective national oversight, with force of law, on such research.’

Imperial defended its research. A spokesperson said: ‘This government-backed research used viruses no more pathogenic than those already circulating within the population and will provide crucial insights that support government decision-making on how to manage the pandemic.

‘It was conducted in a biosafety level three laboratory in line with strict government regulations and received ongoing approval from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).’

The HSE, Britain’s workplace safety watchdog, must be informed of any experiments which involve biological agents.

However, it does not assess or consider the ethical or political basis of whether work should be undertaken in the first place. A spokesperson said: ‘Such considerations are outside of HSE’s regulatory remit.’

Gain of function research was halted in the US from 2014 to 2017 over safety fears. But five years ago, it was allowed to restart, with proponents arguing it could help the world prepare for the next severe illness.

No restrictions have ever been put in place in Britain.

Mail Online approached the Department of Health for comment.

One British expert also acknowledged such research could theoretically create a more dangerous strain of Covid but insisted that the risk was minor.

Professor Robert Dingwall, a sociologist at Nottingham Trent University and ex-Government coronavirus adviser, said the scientists doing the experiments themselves had no desire to be patient zero of a new pandemic.

‘There is a very small risk of creating a more dangerous variant,’ he said.

‘However, I have observed lab scientists at work, and they are very aware that the first risks are to themselves. This is a strong incentive to follow safe working practices.’

There is debate among scientists on if studies like the Imperial experiment constitute gain of function research, as they had not set out to create a more dangerous version of Covid intentionally.

‘It is difficult to draw the line between “gain of function” and “exploration of potential for variation” in advance of experiments being completed,’ Professor Dingwall said.

However, he said such experiments should be more tightly controlled, possibly on a global scale.

‘There should certainly be a formal, independent, review before they go ahead. This may require new regulations to promote a globally shared approach,’ he said.

The Imperial study was approved by the university’s internal genetic manipulation safety committee and the HSE.

Boston’s study, also performed in a BSL-3 lab, wasn’t cleared by the US’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which had part-funded the study.

Professor Francois Balloux, an infectious disease expert at University College London, said such experiments can carry the risk of creating a virus that is ‘marginally more dangerous’.


Picture Above: The Wuhan Institute of Virology, where crucial data was wiped by Chinese scientists


Picture Above: Virologist Shi Zheng-li – nicknamed the ‘Bat Lady’ – is pictured in the lab. She hunted down dozens of deadly Covid-like viruses in bat caves and studied them at the WIV


Picture Above: The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spill over from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. New studies point to a natural spill over at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbor Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bottom right)

However, he added: ‘Such variants emerged multiple times through recombination between strains in circulation.

‘None of those recombinant variants reached high frequency and they are all extinct now, but there were concerns at the time they could be more virulent than Omicron.’

In regard, to whether the research could be classified as gain of function, Professor Balloux said: ‘It is not always easy to decide what exactly falls under gain of function research.

‘Given that essentially the same recombinants emerged naturally and circulated at low frequency for a while, I do not deem those specific experiments to represent gain of function research, but I appreciate others will disagree with my call on this in good faith.’

Gain of function experiments allow scientists to effectively see ‘around the corner’ and anticipate how a pathogen might evolve naturally.

It also gives scientists a chance to better understand its effects on humans, and how it behaves. This can, in theory, speed up the development of drugs and vaccines, especially for infectious diseases that are currently untreatable.

Despite being thrust into the limelight during the Covid pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 isn’t the only pathogen to have been experimented on in this way.

Gain of function has been used for years, including by creating more drought-resistant plants and modifying E. coli so that it breaks down plastic waste.

China’s official pandemic timeline of the coronavirus pandemic and the evidence that undermines it


Dec 8, 2019 – Earliest date that China has acknowledged an infection

Dec 31 – China first reported ‘pneumonia of unknown cause’ to the World Health Organisation

Jan 1, 2020 – Wuhan seafood market closed for disinfection

Jan 7 – President Xi Jinping discusses coronavirus outbreak with his politburo

Jan 9 – China makes public the genome of the coronavirus

Jan 11 – China reported its first death

Jan 13 – First case outside China is confirmed

Jan 20 – China’s National Health Commission confirms human-to-human transmission

Jan 23 – Wuhan locked down

Jan 31 – WHO declared ‘outbreak of international concern’ as China admitted having thousands of cases

Feb 23 – Italy reports cluster of cases in first major outbreak in the West

May 29 – China claims virus did not originate in wet markets but in Chinese bats before it jumped to humans via an ‘intermediary animal’

July 31 – Chinese researcher admits some coronavirus experiments conducted in lower biosafety labs

Dec 16 – WHO announces it will travel to Wuhan to probe origins of virus in January

Jan 5, 2021 – China denies entry to WHO’s investigatory team

Feb 9 – WHO dismisses theory virus leaked from lab – backs China’s claim it was imported from frozen meat

Mar 28 – Former US national security officials say intel shows ‘there was a direct order from Beijing to destroy all viral samples’ at Wuhan lab   



2012: Six miners struck down with a mysterious flu-like illness in Mojiang cave in Yunnan.

They were found to have been infected with the closest known relative to Covid, sharing 97% of its genes.

Samples RATG13 are sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to be studied.

Sep 2019– Blood samples are taken in a lung cancer screening trial in Italy which later test positive for coronavirus

Oct – Whistleblower Wei Jingsheng claims China deliberately spread Covid at The World Military Games in Wuhan in October, two months before the rest of the world knew about the virus

Oct – Xi Jinping’s authoritarian regime tried desperately to shut down whistle-blowers like Mr Jingsheng. Any references made in social media about a new SARS virus or ‘outbreak’ were censored

Oct-Dec – Rise in ‘flu and pneumonia’ cases in northern Italy which could be linked to coronavirus

Nov – Whistleblower Mr Jingsheng claims he took his concerns about the military games to senior figures within the Trump administration but was ignored

Nov – Intelligence report passed to agencies in Washington claims three members of staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology sought hospital treatment in November 2019 after experiencing symptoms consistent with Covid

Nov – Sewage samples taken in Florianópolis, Brazil, suggest virus was present

Nov 10 – Milanese woman has a skin biopsy, producing a sample which later shows signs of the virus

Nov 17 – Leaked documents suggest case detected in China on this date

Dec – Doctors in China, including Li Wenliang, report existence of new type of respiratory infection. But Chinese police arrested him and eight of his colleagues for questioning – instead of publicising reports and warning public

Dec 1 – Chinese researchers report an infection on this date in a peer-reviewed study, but it has not been acknowledged by Beijing

Dec 18 – Sewage samples taken in Milan and Turin suggest virus was circulating in the cities

Dec 26 – Samples analysed suggested a new type of SARS was circulating as early as December 26, but Wuhan was not locked down until January 22

Jan 2020 – Sewage samples from Barcelona suggest virus was in the city

Jan 3 – Covid-19 infections begin sweeping across other nations including the U.S. as the WHO labelled the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern

May – Scientists at a government lab in California concluded that Covid-19 may have escaped from a facility in Wuhan

July – WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said China failed share vital raw data during their investigation in Wuhan. China rebuffed those claims

June 2021: Leading US virus expert Dr Anthony Fauci was warned Covid may have been engineered in a lab, emails publicly released reveal.

August: The world’s first Covid-19 patient may have been infected by a bat while working for a Wuhan lab in China,[5]SEE URL: WHO chief Dr Peter Embarek said

August: A damning report by Republicans in the US claims coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, shortly after the facility tried to improve air safety and waste treatment systems

The report also cited ‘ample evidence’ that lab scientists were working to modify coronaviruses to infect humans and such manipulation could be hidden.

October: US intelligence review into origins of pandemic does not reach a judgement on whether the virus emerged via animal-to-human transmission or a lab leak.

Chinese officials branded the report ‘political and false’.

January 2022: Leaked emails from top UK scientist Sir Jeremy Farrar showed he admitted in February 2020 that it was a ‘likely explanation’ that the virus could be man-made. But he went on to brand the theory a ‘conspiracy’.

February: Sir Farrar is called to be interviewed under oath at the US Congress. Officials want him to explain why he shifted away from the lab leak theory.

Imperial College London

Professor Hugh Brady appointed President of Imperial College London from August 2022

Name:Brady PhD MD FRCPI FRCP MRIA, Professor Hugh R
Position:President of Imperial College London
Department/Section:Office of the President
Division/Department:College Headquarters
Faculty:Central Faculty
Floor:4th Floor
Building:Faculty Building
Campus:South Kensington Campus
Switch board+44 (0)20 7589 5111

4CM DISCLAIMER: in publishing this DOES NOT MEAN 4CM is VERIFYING the VERACITY OF THE CONTENT. We are just making you aware of Data. That has been Dropped on the net. to enable facilitate healthy investigations of the truth, which our reader/viewers maybe pursuing 

ORIGINAL SOURCE: Date-stamped: 2022 Oct 31  - Time-stamped: 21:12 AEDT - Author: John Ely and Luke Andrews - Article Title: Scientists created mutant Covid strains in 'high-risk, low-benefit' lab experiments: SAGE-linked team comes under fire amid calls for more regulation over controversial 'gain-of-function' research. - Article Link 01:

FILE SIZE: 9.47 mb



Unlike many news and information platforms, 4cminews is free to read, and always will be. There is no paywall here. We are independent, not affiliated with nor representing any political party or business organisation. We want the very best for our readers, nothing more, nothing less. Your support will help us continue to provide factual News about world events and Global Agenda’s.

You can contribute here. Thank you.

4cminewswire support independent media service

Hashtags: #4cminewswire, #ImperialCollege, #GainOfFunction, #CovidVirus, #BillGates, #4cminews, #4CM2022OCT29

Tags: 4cminewswire, Imperial College London, Gain of Function, Covid Virus, Bill Gates, 4cminews, 4CMiTV, #4CM2022OCT29



Archive - @4cmdisclosure
Bitchute - @Freedom4CM
Gab TV - @4cminewswire
O.F.T - @4CMiTV
Rumble - @4cmDisclosures


GAB 4cm page
GAB 4cm Groups
99% Global Unite
Australia The Land Down Under
Great Reset Unplugged
QAnon Posts
The Awakening
THE WAY Christianity
99% Unite
Australia The Land Down Under
Freedom Fighters Unite FFU Oceania
SafeChat 4cm Channel
Australia The Land Down Under
XAPiT 4cm Channel
Australia The Land Down Under
End Times
Freedom Movement NZ
Q Chatter
The Awakening
New Zealand
Q Chatter
Australia Red Pill News
Climate Change
United States Red Pill News
United Kingdom Red Pill News
The Message of the Cross
The Way Christianity Without Walls
The Awakening
OTHERS A – Z 4cm Channel
Freedom Book @4cminewswire
Freedom Village @4cminewswire
Friendevu @gary.4cm
Gettr @4cminewswire
Instagram @4cminews
Parler @Gary4cm

Dailymotion, Facebook & YouTube:

(due to egregious censorship our activity is mothballed presently)

FB Page @4cminewswireGlobal
FB Page @GlobalRedPill
FB Page @4cmEndTimes
FB Group @Australia.LDU
FB Group @99%Global
FB Group @Disclosures

Not Applicable

Not Applicable


Global Red Pill News








FREEDOM VILLAGE Social Media Group


GAB Social Media Group


Instagram Social Media Group


LinkedIn Social Media Group


MeWe Social Media Group


SAFECHAT Social Media Group


WHIZNA Social Media Group


YouTube Channel


BitChute Channel


Rumble Channel


GabTV Channel


BrandNewTube Channel


A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.
Step-By-Step Doctors’ Plan That Could Save Your Life
Download Free Booklet
updated 2022FEB02 :
An educational resource from ( The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
Please also watch the companion videos:
1) by Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet
2) by Dr. Peter McCullough

Read Original Article
See Also ...
December 19, 2022
THE PLAN shows the official agenda of the World Health Organization to have ten years of ongoing pandemics, from 2020 to 2030. This is revealed by a WHO virologist, Marion Koopmans. You will also see shocking evidence that the first pandemic was planned and abundantly announced right before it happened.
November 28, 2022
Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world - even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them. The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
November 14, 2022
This well researched documentary is a must see if you want to understand how governments around the world were deceived into BELIEVING the "science" which underpinned the global COVID response. How could people up to the highest levels of society be deceived?
October 04, 2022
Montagnier won the 2008 Nobel Prize for his co-discovery of the link between HIV and AIDS. Fact checkers swiftly deemed these claims to be false and the paper was taken down.
September 24, 2022
Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Physicist, PhD, MD and JD, Dr. Fleming under oath describes the Spike protein bioweapon timeline and the parties involved in its development.
August 14, 2022
You were told the answer to everyone’s prayers was to get the Covid-19 injection. But now that you have done so, the healthcare system is on the brink of collapse. Waiting times for ambulances are at an all-time high. The number of emergency calls due to people suffering cardiac arrest is at an all-time high. The number of people dying is at an all-time high, with hundreds of thousands of excess deaths occurring around the world every single week.
July 11, 2022
Steve Kirsch talks with Brook Jackson and her top legal leads Warner Mendenhall, Robert Barnes about her False Claims case against Pfizer et al.
July 10, 2022
Brook Jackson is the Pfizer whistleblower. Her attorney, Robert Barnes, says that Brook Jackson exposed the fact that the Pfizer clinical trial was riddled with errors and fraudulent and false certifications to the US government.
July 09, 2022
The physicians said that they were suing Twitter for permanently suspending them for posting truthful information about COVID and also failing to provide them with verified badges.
June 19, 2022
We are pleased to bring your attention to the following featured article because it is a clear, well-written description of the monkeypox fraud delivered in a hard-hitting, no-nonsense style. We’ve added some emphases in red. [...]
June 16, 2022
One of the confidential Pfizer documents reveals that approximately 800 people never completed the phase 1 Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial. Click title above to read the full article
June 05, 2022
Instantly view those 3 videos or join the Fully Live Community where you can see various talks and interviews with David, as well as talks with David & Kim! By joining the community you will have access to many more videos!
June 03, 2022
Dr. David Martin lays it all out brilliantly. Inspirational!
June 03, 2022
Part 1 at Wise Traditions Conference 2021 on November 5, 2021
Notify me of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments