December 27, 2022 from Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Executive summary

When I try to debate people on the science so we can expose the truth, they will often say that they don’t want to give me “a platform” to spread my views. Or they will say that “science isn’t settled by debates.”

After I successfully counter both of those arguments, then the reason changes to “I see what you are doing and don’t want any part of it” insinuating I’m a grifter.

Well, what I am doing is to find the truth and expose it. I am open to being challenged on my views. But nobody wants to challenge me.

They say misinformation is a problem, but none of them will lift a finger to correct the misinformation spreaders. Censorship and the lack of interest in settling who is telling the truth is the real problem here.

Meet Matthew Scholer aka @ScholerinED, an ER doctor who posts on Twitter

Here’s his real profile. The people who work with him say unflattering things about him and his willingness to hear opposing viewpoints, but, hey, I’m not here to do ad hominem attacks.

Here are some of his posts that got my attention:

Actually, a lot of us do know more than doctors about a variety of these topics. Anyone making statements like this poses a danger to their profession and should have their license revoked in my opinion.

So let’s see if he’ll defend his statements…

Here’s what happens when I challenged him to defend his statements (or the narrative)

He replied that he’d be giving me a platform

WTF?!?!?! He has 3,000 followers and I have close to a million on all my platforms. He thinks he’s giving me a platform?! Is that how science works?!

Note how I counter each of his arguments:

I also sent him this to chew on; he blocked me after I sent that

He didn’t respond. He blocked me instead. That’s how science works.

Finally, someone admitting the real reason they won’t debate me…

He finally admitted on Twitter that he thinks my goal is to spread misinformation for personal gain and by engaging with me he’d be participating in the scam.

Finally I get an honest reason! He thinks I’m a grifter and he doesn’t want to help me scam more people.

I left (likely) millions of dollars of founder’s stock on the table when I resigned from because the board forced me to choose between my job and telling the truth about the vaccines. I chose to tell the truth and help save lives. My wife asked me how we will be able to support our family. I said we’d deplete all our savings.

Furthermore, I don’t profit one dime from debating him.

In fact, his argument is nonsensical because if he’s so smart and can bring me down in front of all my followers, he’d destroy my “career” as a professional misinformation spreader. So he wouldn’t contribute to my goal… he’d actually be stopping me by exposing me! And he’d also be doing the world a favor in exposing all the arguments of the other misinformation spreaders as false.

So if you are a critical thinker, you see right through his arguments. They don’t hold water.

I suspect that the real reason he won’t debate me is because he knows he’ll lose. Badly. But he can’t admit that, so he has to come up with something plausible that will fool people who are not critical thinkers.


There isn’t a single legitimate reason for avoiding a debate with me or any of the other so-called “misinformation spreaders.” All the reasons they give fall flat.

They aren’t giving us a platform because we’ll only promote the debate to our own followers. If they think we are grifters, ignoring our challenges helps us; debating us will totally destroy us (if we are wrong).

Our goal is to expose the truth. If we are wrong, we’ll admit we are wrong.

They are losing public confidence very rapidly. Today, just 1.3% of eligible children under 5 have been vaccinated with the COVID vaccine (see also this article). How low can you go? I pointed all this out in my Open Letter to CDC Director Walensky.

Finally, not only do they refuse to debate us, but nobody who promotes the government narrative will answer the question as to whether they agree with Professor Prasad’s op-ed or not. It’s a simple Yes/No question. Why won’t anyone answer it? Not even our friend ScholerinED.


Read Original Article
See Also ...
December 19, 2022
THE PLAN shows the official agenda of the World Health Organization to have ten years of ongoing pandemics, from 2020 to 2030. This is revealed by a WHO virologist, Marion Koopmans. You will also see shocking evidence that the first pandemic was planned and abundantly announced right before it happened.
November 28, 2022
Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world - even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them. The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
November 14, 2022
This well researched documentary is a must see if you want to understand how governments around the world were deceived into BELIEVING the "science" which underpinned the global COVID response. How could people up to the highest levels of society be deceived?
October 04, 2022
Montagnier won the 2008 Nobel Prize for his co-discovery of the link between HIV and AIDS. Fact checkers swiftly deemed these claims to be false and the paper was taken down.
September 24, 2022
Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Physicist, PhD, MD and JD, Dr. Fleming under oath describes the Spike protein bioweapon timeline and the parties involved in its development.
August 14, 2022
You were told the answer to everyone’s prayers was to get the Covid-19 injection. But now that you have done so, the healthcare system is on the brink of collapse. Waiting times for ambulances are at an all-time high. The number of emergency calls due to people suffering cardiac arrest is at an all-time high. The number of people dying is at an all-time high, with hundreds of thousands of excess deaths occurring around the world every single week.
July 11, 2022
Steve Kirsch talks with Brook Jackson and her top legal leads Warner Mendenhall, Robert Barnes about her False Claims case against Pfizer et al.
July 10, 2022
Brook Jackson is the Pfizer whistleblower. Her attorney, Robert Barnes, says that Brook Jackson exposed the fact that the Pfizer clinical trial was riddled with errors and fraudulent and false certifications to the US government.
July 09, 2022
The physicians said that they were suing Twitter for permanently suspending them for posting truthful information about COVID and also failing to provide them with verified badges.
June 19, 2022
We are pleased to bring your attention to the following featured article because it is a clear, well-written description of the monkeypox fraud delivered in a hard-hitting, no-nonsense style. We’ve added some emphases in red. [...]
June 16, 2022
One of the confidential Pfizer documents reveals that approximately 800 people never completed the phase 1 Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial. Click title above to read the full article
June 05, 2022
Instantly view those 3 videos or join the Fully Live Community where you can see various talks and interviews with David, as well as talks with David & Kim! By joining the community you will have access to many more videos!
June 03, 2022
Dr. David Martin lays it all out brilliantly. Inspirational!
June 03, 2022
Part 1 at Wise Traditions Conference 2021 on November 5, 2021
Notify me of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments