April 2020 – a huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.

• January 2021 – a huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.

• January 2021 – a huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.

Throw in the fact that –

• Hospital beds in April 2020 30% were down compared to the previous year.

• A&E attendance was 57% down in April 2020 compared to the previous year.

• Care home deaths were 205% up in April 2020 compared to April 2019.

Source Data

• And the vast majority of alleged Covid deaths have been among people over the age of 85.

Then it’s quite simple to see how Matt Hancock orchestrated what amounts to the mass murder of the elderly and vulnerable by forcing them into care homes, refusing them proper medical care, putting them on the end-of-life pathway, overprescribing mizaolam and then falsely labelling the deaths as being due to Covid-19.

Did you really believe there’s a virus so clever that it knows to kill people who are disabled? Just look at the ONS statistics.

Three in every five alleged Covid-19 deaths occurred in those who suffered learning difficulties and disabilities (see here).

In relation to deaths of people with learning difficulties the ONS said – ‘the largest effect was associated with living in a care home or other communal establishment.‘

Having a learning difficulty and being in care doesn’t mean you are more likely to die of Covid-19. What it means is that you are much more likely to have a DNR order placed on you without informing yourself or your family, which Carers / NHS staff then use as permission to put you on end-of-life care, which involves the administration of Midazolam.

We know this happened because an Amnesty report and CQC report said so.

The Amnesty report states that –

‘Care home managers and staff and relatives of care home residents in different parts of the country told Amnesty International how, in their experience, sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused by hospitals, ambulance teams, and GPs. A manager in Yorkshire said: “We were heavily discouraged from sending residents to hospital. We talked about it in meetings; we were all aware of this.”’

‘Another manager in Hampshire recalled:

There wasn’t much option to send people to hospital. We managed to send one patient to hospital because the nurse was very firm and insisted that the lady was too uncomfortable and we could not do any more to make her more comfortable but the hospital could. In hospital the lady tested COVID positive and was treated and survived and came back. She is 92 and in great shape.

She explained that:
There was a presumption that people in care homes would all die if they got COVID, which is wrong. It shows how little the government knows about the reality of care homes.‘

‘The son of one care home resident who passed away in Cumbria said that sending his father to hospital had not even been considered:

From day one, the care home was categoric it was probably COVID and he would die of it and he would not be taken to hospital. He only had a cough at that stage. He was only 76 and was in great shape physically. He loved to go out and it would not have been a problem for him to go to hospital. The care home called me and said he had symptoms, a bit of a cough and that doctor had assessed him over mobile phone and he would not be taken to hospital.

Then I spoke to the GP later that day and said h would not be taken to hospital but would be given morphine if in pain. Later he collapsed on the floor in
the bathroom and the care home called the paramedic who established that he had no injury and put him back to bed and told the carers not to call them back for any Covid-related symptoms because they would not return. He died a week later.

He was never tested. No doctor ever came to the care home. The GP assessed him over the phone. In an identical situation for someone living at home instead of in a care home, the advice was “go to hospital”. The death certificate says pneumonia and COVID, but pneumonia was never mentioned to us.’

‘A care home manager in Yorkshire told Amnesty International:
In March, I tried to get [a resident] into hospital—the ambulance had employed a doctor to do triage but they said, “Well he’s end of life anyway so we’re not going to send an ambulance” … Under normal circumstances he would have gone to hospital … I think he was entitled to be admitted to hospital. These are individuals who have contributed to society all their lives and were denied the respect and dignity that you would give to a 42-year-old; they were [considered] expendable.‘

The CQC felt it necessary to issue a statement in August 2020 addressing the issue of inappropriate DNR’s being placed on care home residents without informing residents or their families –

‘It is vitally important that older and disabled people living in care homes and in the community can access hospital care and treatment for COVID-19 and other conditions when they need it during the pandemic … Providers should always work to prevent avoidable harm or death for all those they care for.

Protocols, guidelines and triage systems should be based on equality of access to care and treatment. If they are based on assumptions that some groups are less entitled to care and treatment than others, this would be discriminatory. It would also potentially breach human rights, including the right to life, even if there were concerns that hospital or critical care capacity may be reached.’

That statement was issued because the CQC found that 34% of people working in health and social care were pressured into placing ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders on Covid patients who suffered from disabilities and learning difficulties, without involving the patient or their families in the decision.

It was decided in 2013 after a review that the ‘Liverpool Care Pathway‘ was to be abolished. The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was a scheme that we’re told intended to improve the quality of care in the final hours or days of a patient’s life.

Its alleged aim was to ensure a peaceful and comfortable death. The LCP was a guide to doctors, nurses and other health workers looking after someone who was dying on issues such as the appropriate time to remove tubes providing food and fluid, or when to stop medication.

The reason it was decided it should be abolished is that the review found hospital staff wrongly interpreted its guidance for care of the dying, leading to stories of patients who were drugged and deprived of fluids in their last weeks of life.

The evidence suggests that the Liverpool Care Pathway returned with a vengeance in April 2020 under the direction of Health Secretary Matt Hancock, Government Advisors and NHS Chiefs, and it looks as if it was used to manipulate you into giving up two years of your life under the pretence that you were staying at home, to protect the NHS and save lives.

But in reality, while you did that as you were told, Matt Hancock orchestrated the mass murder of the elderly and vulnerable in care homes with a drug called midazolam and then falsely told you that they had all died of Covid-19.

This is why ‘Midazolam Matt’ Hancock should be in prison right now.

Not being paid hundreds of thousands to be in the I’m A Celeb jungle on primetime national television promoting his upcoming book that will allegedly tell his version of events of the Pandemic before the current public inquiry into the response to Covid-19 ruins any hope he has of being able to show his face in public ever again.’

SOURCE:

https://expose-news.com/2022/11/11/midzolam-matt-genocide-elderly-prison-not-jungle/