November 25, 2022 from Rounding the Earth Newsletter

Find out more about the Information Wars here.

It took me a bit of time to decide whether or not this would be a Science Wars article. But at the core of this article is information warfare that obscures any opportunity to breach the domain of Science.

What is the RTE-Gorski Challenge?

Recall my recorded conversation with Debunk the Funk:

It was an okay conversation at the outset, not the best. Dan showed that he could verbally run around in a few circles and pretend the existence of research he couldn't point to. At the outset, I'm out-jargoned to a degree, but that's fine. A good faith conversation overcomes that, and being bad faith on every level is too much of a risk for somebody who seems like their job is to be an intellectual bully while pretending that's not what they're doing. My hope was to steer the conversation toward the foundational basics. When we got there, it became immediately clear that Dan Wilson is mathematically illiterate on the topic on which he was making statistical arguments. Few people of any mathematical literacy could fail to see it.

That's the RTE-Gorski challenge in essence: if you want to project yourself as an expert in a quantitative field, come on for an interview with me. I will ask a fair set of questions and walk through the math/stats.

I'm sure that not everyone will give me credit as a fair judge. However, my conversation with Stuart Buck which involved many points of contention, was quite friendly. I've been able to express friendly disagreement with several guests whom I strongly suspect will say that all parties were always respectful. Further, if somebody came on the RTE podcast and blew my mind with a perspective I hadn't imagined that spun me around, I'd thank them profusely. I have changed my mind, including on multiple issues during the pandemic.

The Gorski challenge has also been offered to Dr. Susan Oliver. She hasn't exactly declined, but declined to answer while flying monkeys came in to white knight her.

I won't lie. In this particular case, I fully expect that Dr. Oliver will fail the challenge. With Dan, I wasn't sure where the conversation was headed, though I knew I wanted to get into the math to see if we could pinpoint differences in data interpretations.

What Does This Have To Do With Gorski?

Glad you asked. I'll share what I previously wrote about Dr. David Gorski:

David Gorski, MD, PhD

Because people who need you to see their credential letters on Twitter are the most secure in their expertise, am I right?

Gorski is an oncologist who may or may not have chosen that profession because he enjoys burning people. He is part of the editorial team at the Science-Based Medicine blog that attacks any sufficiently important target that defies "The Science". He also writes under the pseudonym Orac at the full-stop attack blog Respectful Insolence, where his verbally vicious nature gets a bit more unhinged.

Once upon a time, Gorski claimed to me that he has read "pretty much every HCQ study" (out of around 200?) in November, 2020 (I actually had). So, I asked him four simple questions about the research, and he did not answer any of them, and then blocked me.

I would be willing to host him for a discussion of the hydroxychloroquine research on the RTE podcast. It would include a more complete quiz, including, "For which viruses do you recommend not taking an antiviral until after viral replication is largely complete?"

But Gorski has bigger targets than me. I'm old enough to remember that time that Gorski challenged the world's most well-published microbiologist on Twitter about the Surgisphere dumpster fire.

At some point, I think he must have paid for Twitter bots because his past posts and replies leapt in popularity signals, and pretty uniformly, in a way that belies the natural accrual of popularity. Feel free to examine his retweet army and tell me if you disagree.

Gorski is a much bigger pfish than either Dan Wilson or Dr. Oliver. He has long cultivated an image as a debunker running sciencey-sounding attacks on those not following along with Pharmapartisan narratives. I've often wondered whether somebody else writes his material. But it's clear that when I get to press him on claims of his knowledge, he is unable to answer basic questions where he clearly claimed deep knowledge. He never admits mistakes or apologizes for his verbal assaults.

Recently, Steve Kirsch included me on some email exchanges with Gorski. Yet again, Gorski wilted from the challenge of public discussion. (The topic was whether vaccines might be causing an increase in aortic dissections.)

Gorski did not respond, but continued to debate about aortic dissections with Steve by not addressing the discussion, insulting people, and laying out a laundry list of links without real explanation that presumably justified his point-of-view if you cared to spend 6 hours reading them (and 60 hours dissecting his nonsense). So, I poked him again.

Here is Gorski dodging the idea of a recorded call in which he could demonstrate his authority.

Ultimately, there is little Gorski could do on the level of persuasion that would be more demonstrative than showing his capability as a quantitative scientist. After all, that's a lot of what he pounds his chest about. It would take less than the time of writing one of his articles—maybe even less time than it takes for him to phrase his usual smears that insinuate the lack of comprehension by those he smears. So, I take his dodge as a total lack of veracity and confidence. How could I not?

Thus, I honor Gorski with the challenge title, and it's one that I plan to make in the future, both to those with whom I agree and those with whom I disagree—because it's extremely important for the public to understand the nature of proxy trust. Over time, such displays of the true nature of background skill might not only help people know whom they can listen to, but also get a sense of whether entire fields project a false picture of certain levels of quantitative expertise by members of their field.


Subscribe now

Read Original Article
See Also ...
December 19, 2022
THE PLAN shows the official agenda of the World Health Organization to have ten years of ongoing pandemics, from 2020 to 2030. This is revealed by a WHO virologist, Marion Koopmans. You will also see shocking evidence that the first pandemic was planned and abundantly announced right before it happened.
November 28, 2022
Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world - even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them. The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
November 14, 2022
This well researched documentary is a must see if you want to understand how governments around the world were deceived into BELIEVING the "science" which underpinned the global COVID response. How could people up to the highest levels of society be deceived?
October 04, 2022
Montagnier won the 2008 Nobel Prize for his co-discovery of the link between HIV and AIDS. Fact checkers swiftly deemed these claims to be false and the paper was taken down.
September 24, 2022
Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Physicist, PhD, MD and JD, Dr. Fleming under oath describes the Spike protein bioweapon timeline and the parties involved in its development.
August 14, 2022
You were told the answer to everyone’s prayers was to get the Covid-19 injection. But now that you have done so, the healthcare system is on the brink of collapse. Waiting times for ambulances are at an all-time high. The number of emergency calls due to people suffering cardiac arrest is at an all-time high. The number of people dying is at an all-time high, with hundreds of thousands of excess deaths occurring around the world every single week.
July 11, 2022
Steve Kirsch talks with Brook Jackson and her top legal leads Warner Mendenhall, Robert Barnes about her False Claims case against Pfizer et al.
July 10, 2022
Brook Jackson is the Pfizer whistleblower. Her attorney, Robert Barnes, says that Brook Jackson exposed the fact that the Pfizer clinical trial was riddled with errors and fraudulent and false certifications to the US government.
July 09, 2022
The physicians said that they were suing Twitter for permanently suspending them for posting truthful information about COVID and also failing to provide them with verified badges.
June 19, 2022
We are pleased to bring your attention to the following featured article because it is a clear, well-written description of the monkeypox fraud delivered in a hard-hitting, no-nonsense style. We’ve added some emphases in red. [...]
June 16, 2022
One of the confidential Pfizer documents reveals that approximately 800 people never completed the phase 1 Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial. Click title above to read the full article
June 05, 2022
Instantly view those 3 videos or join the Fully Live Community where you can see various talks and interviews with David, as well as talks with David & Kim! By joining the community you will have access to many more videos!
June 03, 2022
Dr. David Martin lays it all out brilliantly. Inspirational!
June 03, 2022
British Medical Journal  by Kevin Bardosh1,2, Alex de Figueiredo3, Rachel Gur-Arie et al. Abstract Vaccination policies have shifted dramatically during COVID-19 with the rapid emergence of population-wide vaccine mandates, domestic vaccine passports and differential restrictions based on vaccination status. While these policies have prompted ethi
Notify me of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments