January 18, 2023 from Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Executive summary

The data I’ve been able to collect is consistent with the hypothesis that the more boosters you get, the worse the outcome.

Even the Moderna data was consistent with that.


I did a survey of hospitals on January 12, 2023 and got 101 responses.

Only one hospital, The Wayne Center (nursing home) Wayne PA, did they think the booster made things slightly better. In 10 places, it made NO DIFFERENCE. Everywhere else, the reporters believed it made things worse.

In 71 places, they believed it made things MUCH WORSE.

But wait… didn’t the government agencies say it reduces your risk of death from COVID by 10X?

If that is true, then how come I can’t find any nursing home in the world where that happened? It’s easy to find places where the all-cause mortality (ACM) skyrocketed after the shot (one Australian nursing home in Clifton Hill lost over 20% of their residents in 12 months after the shots rolled out), but I can’t seem to find a success story where the ACM plummeted after the shots. Odd, isn’t it?

Moderna data that was initially withheld from the FDA

More troubling is that Moderna decided not to share with the FDA panel information that is consistent with my hypothesis that more boosters made you more likely to be infected with COVID.

Find this hard to believe? This is a direct quote from the CNN article entitled FDA vaccine advisers ‘disappointed’ and ‘angry’ that early data about new Covid-19 booster shot wasn’t presented for review last year which said:

The data that was not presented to the experts looked at actual infections: who caught Covid-19 and who did not.

It found that 1.9% of the study participants who received the original booster became infected. Among those who got the updated bivalent vaccine – the one that scientists hoped would work better – a higher percentage, 3.2%, became infected. Both versions of the shot were found to be safe.

In other words, when the data shows the vaccines aren’t working, the drug companies do the only ethical (in their mind) thing: they withhold the data from the FDA panel.

Paul Offit said he’s not getting the bivalent booster. He said there is no benefit and it’s all risk. For once, I agree with Paul.

If Paul Offit isn’t taking the new bivalent booster, why should you?

Answer: You shouldn’t. Nobody should.

Will anyone from the drug companies debate any of us on whether more boosters are both safe and beneficial?

No way. They’d lose.

The drug companies don’t stand behind their product. They don’t need to because:

  1. they have liability protection (why do they need that again???) and

  2. because they have conned lawmakers all over the world into coercing people to take the vaccine.

The only thing a debate would do is expose that they are lying about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. That’s why none of them will take my $1M bet (with a term sheet similar to this one I negotiated with Saar Wilf for $500K) and show the world I’m wrong. Because they know they will lose and that will end their revenue stream.

I’m willing to bet anyone $1M I’m right on any of these topics:

  1. The mRNA vaccines in the US have killed more people than they’ve saved

  2. The three randomized trials have not shown that masks make a measurable positive difference in protecting people from getting COVID

  3. The mRNA COVID vaccines cause strokes

  4. The mRNA vaccines cause measurable heart injury in >2% of people injected

  5. The vaccines have seriously injured over 500,000 people in America

  6. More boosters do not improve your risk of death

You can accept any of these bets here if you are serious about negotiating a term sheet similar to this term sheet.


They (CDC and medical community) are willing to risk your LIFE that they are right about the safety of the COVID vaccines, but aren't willing to risk even a dime of their MONEY that they are wrong.

In short, for the drug companies, I’m willing to lower the bet to a dime just to prove that they won’t even risk a dime of their money. But risking your life? No problem! They have no liability!

Think about it.

You should be very upset about this.

Read Original Article
See Also ...
December 19, 2022
THE PLAN shows the official agenda of the World Health Organization to have ten years of ongoing pandemics, from 2020 to 2030. This is revealed by a WHO virologist, Marion Koopmans. You will also see shocking evidence that the first pandemic was planned and abundantly announced right before it happened.
November 28, 2022
Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world - even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them. The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
November 14, 2022
This well researched documentary is a must see if you want to understand how governments around the world were deceived into BELIEVING the "science" which underpinned the global COVID response. How could people up to the highest levels of society be deceived?
October 04, 2022
Montagnier won the 2008 Nobel Prize for his co-discovery of the link between HIV and AIDS. Fact checkers swiftly deemed these claims to be false and the paper was taken down.
September 24, 2022
Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Physicist, PhD, MD and JD, Dr. Fleming under oath describes the Spike protein bioweapon timeline and the parties involved in its development.
August 14, 2022
You were told the answer to everyone’s prayers was to get the Covid-19 injection. But now that you have done so, the healthcare system is on the brink of collapse. Waiting times for ambulances are at an all-time high. The number of emergency calls due to people suffering cardiac arrest is at an all-time high. The number of people dying is at an all-time high, with hundreds of thousands of excess deaths occurring around the world every single week.
July 11, 2022
Steve Kirsch talks with Brook Jackson and her top legal leads Warner Mendenhall, Robert Barnes about her False Claims case against Pfizer et al.
July 10, 2022
Brook Jackson is the Pfizer whistleblower. Her attorney, Robert Barnes, says that Brook Jackson exposed the fact that the Pfizer clinical trial was riddled with errors and fraudulent and false certifications to the US government.
July 09, 2022
The physicians said that they were suing Twitter for permanently suspending them for posting truthful information about COVID and also failing to provide them with verified badges.
June 19, 2022
We are pleased to bring your attention to the following featured article because it is a clear, well-written description of the monkeypox fraud delivered in a hard-hitting, no-nonsense style. We’ve added some emphases in red. [...]
June 16, 2022
One of the confidential Pfizer documents reveals that approximately 800 people never completed the phase 1 Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial. Click title above to read the full article
June 05, 2022
Instantly view those 3 videos or join the Fully Live Community where you can see various talks and interviews with David, as well as talks with David & Kim! By joining the community you will have access to many more videos!
June 03, 2022
Dr. David Martin lays it all out brilliantly. Inspirational!
June 03, 2022
British Medical Journal  by Kevin Bardosh1,2, Alex de Figueiredo3, Rachel Gur-Arie et al. Abstract Vaccination policies have shifted dramatically during COVID-19 with the rapid emergence of population-wide vaccine mandates, domestic vaccine passports and differential restrictions based on vaccination status. While these policies have prompted ethi
Notify me of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments